메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Sun-Ok Chung (Chungnam National University) Yong-Joo Kim (Chungnam National University) Kyu-Ho Lee (Chungnam National University) Cheol-Hwi Lee (Chungcheongnam-do Agricultural Research & Extension Services) Hyun-Kwon Noh (Chungbuk National University)
저널정보
충남대학교 농업과학연구소 Korean Journal of Agricultural Science Korean Journal of Agricultural Science Vol.44 No.4
발행연도
2017.12
수록면
604 - 612 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, the effects of planting density on the growth of chrysanthemum in a greenhouse were evaluated on two popular varieties (i.e., Sinma and Moonlight). Planting density treatments were as follows: 1) 12 cm × 12 cm, 2) 6 cm × 12 cm, 3) 6 cm × 12 cm with one-cell vacant, and 4) 6 cm × 12 cm with two-cell vacant. Size of each treatments indicate one chrysanthemum was planted in that sized cell that was rectangular shaped field and these treatments were located in a line. Moreover, “one and two-cell vacant” means that it makes middle point of the field empty, offers beside chrysanthemum larger spaces to grow. For the Sinma variety, the results of growth and flowering characteristics at the harvesting stage showed that leaf number, leaf length, flower length, and leaf area were highest when the crop was planted at the 12 cm × 12 cm density, and the next preferable density was 6 cm × 12 cm with one-cell vacant. For the Moonlight variety, the results showed that stalk height and diameter, leaf number and length, flower length, leaf area, and flower number were highest at the 12 cm × 12 cm planting density. For Sinma, ratios of marketable production were 87.5% and 83.3% for the 12 cm × 12 cm and 6 cm × 12 cm with two-cell vacant, respectively. For Moonlight, ratios were 88.0% and 84.3% for the 12 cm × 12 cm and 6 cm × 12 cm with two-cell vacant.

목차

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-520-001702238