지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to examine the current status of Korean medicine health technology assessment and explore realistic plans to activate it.
Methods: We investigated all the applications for new health technology assessment related to Korean medicine from 2007 to 2016. The several expert meetings were held to draw out the barriers and improvement strategies of the new health technology assessment of Korean medicine field.
Results: There were 31 cases in total except for duplications or reapplies falling into 3 main types. First, 19 of them were to try to enter a medical market and be covered by National Health Insurance. Eight cases were to apply western medicine technology as new health technology in Korean medicine area. The rest was 4 cases, which were totally not appropriate for the purpose of new health technology assessment system. According to the expert opinion, the obstacles of activation in new health technology assessment of Korean medicine were application of unstandardized technology, lack of understanding and experience, lack of clinical trial supporting system for Korean medicine, lack of committee members within the nHTA(new Health Technology Assessment) review board, ambiguous definition of medical practice and sharp conflict between western medicine and Korean medicine.
Conclusions: Several suggestions were derived. First of all, to activate Korean medicine in the nHTA system, the existing system should be used sufficiently, and multifaceted efforts are needed to upgrade the system, if necessary. Also, self-help efforts, Korean medicine clinical trial supporting system and increasing R&D investment, establishing extra-committee for Korean medicine in nHTA could be needed. Finally, long-term strategy for improving collaboration between Korean medicine and western medicine should be considered.
Methods: We investigated all the applications for new health technology assessment related to Korean medicine from 2007 to 2016. The several expert meetings were held to draw out the barriers and improvement strategies of the new health technology assessment of Korean medicine field.
Results: There were 31 cases in total except for duplications or reapplies falling into 3 main types. First, 19 of them were to try to enter a medical market and be covered by National Health Insurance. Eight cases were to apply western medicine technology as new health technology in Korean medicine area. The rest was 4 cases, which were totally not appropriate for the purpose of new health technology assessment system. According to the expert opinion, the obstacles of activation in new health technology assessment of Korean medicine were application of unstandardized technology, lack of understanding and experience, lack of clinical trial supporting system for Korean medicine, lack of committee members within the nHTA(new Health Technology Assessment) review board, ambiguous definition of medical practice and sharp conflict between western medicine and Korean medicine.
Conclusions: Several suggestions were derived. First of all, to activate Korean medicine in the nHTA system, the existing system should be used sufficiently, and multifaceted efforts are needed to upgrade the system, if necessary. Also, self-help efforts, Korean medicine clinical trial supporting system and increasing R&D investment, establishing extra-committee for Korean medicine in nHTA could be needed. Finally, long-term strategy for improving collaboration between Korean medicine and western medicine should be considered.
목차
서론
본론
결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (7)
참고문헌 신청
이민 / 2014 / 한국 의료기술평가의 현황과 문제점 그리고 개선책 / 대한의사협회지 57(11):906~911
Shin, Y / 1999 / Policy Development for the Management of New Health Technologies
Lee, S.M. / 2011 / Status of New Health Technology in Korean / Journal of the Korean Academy of Dental Insurance :9~30
한창현 / 2012 / 한의 신의료기술 행위 동향 분석 / Korean Journal of Acupuncture 29(2):315~326
이연주 / 2017 / 2007년 이후 한의약 분야의 신의료기술 현황 / 대한한의학회지 38(1):21~33
Shin, Y / 1999 / Policy Development for the Management of New Health Technologies
Lee, S.M. / 2011 / Status of New Health Technology in Korean / Journal of the Korean Academy of Dental Insurance :9~30
한창현 / 2012 / 한의 신의료기술 행위 동향 분석 / Korean Journal of Acupuncture 29(2):315~326
이연주 / 2017 / 2007년 이후 한의약 분야의 신의료기술 현황 / 대한한의학회지 38(1):21~33
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한의사의 의료기기 사용과 주의의무에 있어서 한방의료행위의 새로운 이해
대한예방한의학회지
2019 .01
-
신의료기술 신청 현황과 평가 결과 분석을 통한 한의 신의료기술 개발 방안
대한예방한의학회지
2017 .01
-
2007년 이후 한의약 분야의 신의료기술 현황
대한한의학회지
2017 .03
-
청년층(만19~39세)의 한의의료이용 결정요인 및 행동의도 -『2017년 한방의료이용 및 한약소비실태조사』 마이크로데이터를 중심으로 -
대한예방한의학회지
2021 .08
-
Origins and Evolution of Social Medicine and Contemporary Social Medicine in Korea
예방의학회지
2017 .01
-
결핵의 재구성: 질병분류의 정치와 식민지 조선 한의학의 정체성
연세의사학
2017 .12
-
Two Fronts of Future Medicine
International Neurourology Journal
2018 .01
-
교통사고 후 한의치료에 대한 만족도 조사 연구
대한예방한의학회지
2021 .12
-
한의학 교육의 연구 동향 : 국내외 연구를 바탕으로
대한한의학회지
2024 .06
-
일개 보건소의 양약-한약 병용투여 현황 보고: 2019년 의무기록에 대한 후향적 분석
대한예방한의학회지
2020 .01
-
한의학의 정의에 관한 연구
동의생리병리학회지
2019 .01
-
한의학의 정의에 관한 연구
동의생리병리학회지
2019 .10
-
한의약육성법의 함의 및 발전방향
대한예방한의학회지
2022 .08
-
코로나19 전후 한방의료서비스 이용의 변화 비교 연구
대한예방한의학회지
2024 .08
-
학술의학(Academic Medicine)의 개념과 한국에서의 정착 가능성
의학교육논단
2019 .01
-
한의학에서 근거중심진료와 표준화의 필요성 - 2008, 2011, 2014년 한방의료이용실태조사(보건복지부)중 소비자의견을 중심으로
대한예방한의학회지
2016 .12
-
델파이-AHP 기법을 사용한 국가한의약정책 우선순위에 관한 연구 - 제4차 한의약육성발전종합계획을 중심으로 -
대한예방한의학회지
2022 .08
-
인문사회의학(의료인문학)의 범주와 교육과정 - 한의학 교육 중심으로 -
대한예방한의학회지
2021 .08
-
한의 표준임상진료지침 및 한의 표준임상경로에 대한 한의사의 인식
대한예방한의학회지
2022 .08
-
군진 한의학 근거 기반 구축을 위한 한의군의관 진료 현황 및 인식 조사 연구
대한한의학회지
2017 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-519-000981258